Skip to main content

House Speaker Paul Ryan is seen during a weekly news conference on Capitol Hill, in Washington, D.C., on June 6, 2018.

ERIN SCHAFF /The New York Times News Service

House Speaker Paul Ryan contradicted President Donald Trump’s assertions of a broad conspiracy by federal law enforcement on Wednesday, joining other lawmakers in saying that the FBI did nothing wrong by using a confidential informant to contact members of the Trump campaign as it investigated its ties to Russia.

And he said that Trump should not try to pardon himself, despite the president’s assertion two days earlier that he has the power to take such a step.

“I don’t know the technical answer to that question, but I think obviously the answer is he shouldn’t,” Ryan told reporters. “And no one is above the law.”

Story continues below advertisement

Ryan’s warning was the latest indication that the president is beginning to face trouble on Capitol Hill, where members of his own party are showing small signs of resistance. From international trade and China to immigration and the conduct of his Cabinet, serious dissent from at least some Republicans is beginning to boil over.

At the forefront is an effort by Sens. Bob Corker of Tennessee and Patrick J. Toomey of Pennsylvania to try to attach legislation to a must-pass defence policy bill that would require Trump to petition Congress for approval to impose national security tariffs, like those the White House has imposed on steel and aluminum produced in Canada, Mexico and Europe.

More than a half-dozen Republican senators have signed on to the amendment, and a small group of Republicans decamped Wednesday to the White House to try to navigate tensions with a protectionist president who has drastically departed from his party’s traditional embrace of free markets.

“I think this is a very bad idea, Mr. President,” Toomey said on the Senate floor. “I think it is a very bad path to be going on, very bad policy.”

Some Republicans are just as furious about Trump’s efforts to lift sanctions on a Chinese telecommunications company, ZTE. Last month, the House passed a bill that would prevent the administration from easing restrictions on the company, and the Senate Banking Committee approved a similar amendment that would prevent the president from modifying penalties on Chinese telecom companies that had violated American law in the past year.

On immigration, almost two dozen House Republicans are demanding votes on legislation that would help young immigrants brought to the country illegally as children, but are balking at the president’s get-tough demands on other immigration matters. And Iowa’s senators, Charles E. Grassley and Joni Ernst, both Republicans, came out swinging this week against the Environmental Protection Agency administrator, Scott Pruitt, whom Ernst called “as swampy as you get.”

But for Republicans, no issue has consumed more oxygen than the Justice Department probe into Russian interference in the 2016 election. Trump has seized on the disclosure of the use of an informant to claim, without evidence, that federal law enforcement officials had improperly placed a spy in his campaign “for political purposes.” He demanded a Justice Department inquiry of the matter and dubbed the matter “SPYGATE” in repeated posts on Twitter.

Story continues below advertisement

Ryan became the highest-ranking Republican to throw cold water on that interpretation, which Democrats and former high-level law enforcement officials have claimed is part of an unrelenting effort to discredit the open investigation into Trump and his campaign. Ryan backed Rep. Trey Gowdy, R-S.C., who led the House’s politically charged investigation into the 2012 attack in Benghazi, Libya, but infuriated some Republican partisans by rebuffing Trump on “Spygate.”

“Chairman Gowdy’s initial assessment is accurate, but we have more digging to do,” Ryan told reporters at a news conference Wednesday.

The comments appeared to be the latest sign that an uneasy truce between the party’s two most powerful figures might be fraying once more, now that Ryan has announced he is not running for re-election. Despite a burst of Republican policy achievements – including a $1.5-trillion tax cut – the two men have more often than not appeared to embody two entirely independent Republican parties.

Trump has railed against free trade, immigration and Republican efforts to cut Social Security and Medicare, while veering toward the conspiratorial. Ryan, a Wisconsin conservative a generation younger, still speaks of trying to broaden the Republican Party’s appeal to minorities and has fought to move the president away from protectionist policies and racially divisive messaging.

And while Trump has denounced the Russia investigation, and pulled much of the party along with him, Ryan has repeatedly insisted that the special counsel, Robert Mueller, be allowed to finish his work.

Gowdy and Ryan were among a small group of congressional leaders briefed on the informant late last month by top officials from the FBI, Justice Department and the office of the director of national intelligence. The unusual meeting came after Trump intervened on behalf of Rep. Devin Nunes, R-Calif., the House Intelligence Committee chairman, who was demanding information related to the informant.

Story continues below advertisement

Ryan has encouraged Gowdy, a former federal prosecutor and one of House Republicans’ most experienced investigators, to help calm tensions between Nunes and the Justice Department. The two sides have repeatedly clashed as Nunes, a close ally of the president, has demanded greater and greater access to sensitive case files.

Democrats emerged from the highly secretive briefing saying that they had seen “no evidence to support any allegation that the FBI or any intelligence agency placed a ‘spy’ in the Trump campaign, or otherwise failed to follow appropriate procedures and protocols.” But Gowdy was the first Republican to break ranks a few days later, when he said on Fox News that the agency had acted properly.

“I think when the president finds out what happened, he is going to be not just fine, he is going to be glad that we have an FBI that took seriously what they heard,” Gowdy said.

He added: “I am even more convinced that the FBI did exactly what my fellow citizens would want them to do when they got the information they got, and that it has nothing to do with Donald Trump.”

People familiar with the matter have said that the informant was a U.S. academic and veteran of Republican administrations who was to trying to glean information about what several campaign aides knew about the Russian efforts to hack into Democratic emails.

Sen. Richard M. Burr of North Carolina, the Republican chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee, also put his support behind Gowdy’s analysis on Wednesday, following Ryan’s remarks. Burr had been silent after participating in the confidential briefing on the matter in late May.

Conservative allies of Trump and Nunes, who have not been briefed on the matter by law enforcement or intelligence officials, have publicly disagreed with Gowdy, claiming that the FBI and Justice Department had essentially pulled the wool over the eyes of the South Carolina Republican.

Nunes, for his part, appeared to dismiss the importance of Gowdy’s statements in an interview on Sunday.

“Mr. Gowdy loves the FBI and the Department of Justice,” Nunes said.

Still, Nunes signalled on Sunday that he would like to bring the episode to a close. Speaking on Fox News, he said that he expected the Justice Department to share additional information and documentation with him this week.

“Just provide us all the documents, everything we’re asking for and let us comb all the way through it and we’ll issue a letter on Friday and we’ll be done with this,” Nunes said.

Ryan’s warning on a “self-pardon” reflected other Republican concerns. Sen. Mitch McConnell of Kentucky, the majority leader, cast the issue of Trump pardoning himself in similar terms on Tuesday.

“He obviously knows that would not be something that he would or should do,” McConnell said.

Report an error
Comments

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

If your comment doesn't appear immediately it has been sent to a member of our moderation team for review

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.