Skip to main content

Iron Bridge Resources Inc. is urging its shareholders to reject a $116-million hostile offer from privately held Velvet Energy Ltd., saying the suitor aims to wrest potentially big production from its key property on the cheap.

In a formal response to the bid, launched last month, Iron Bridge said it is evaluating offers from lenders to fund development of the Gold Creek property in Alberta, which is in an oil-rich part of the Montney formation. Velvet has been assembling a land position in the area for a number of years.

Velvet, which is backed by Warburg Pincus LLC, Trilantic Capital Partners, 1901 Partners Management LP and Canada Pension Plan Investment Board, has offered 75 cents a share for Iron Bridge, a company that recently underwent a restructuring and name change. It used to be known as RMP Energy.

Story continues below advertisement

“The all-cash offer deliberately strips Iron Bridge’s shareholders of their ability to maintain exposure to the growth upside of the company’s Gold Creek Montney asset and the improvement in the commodity sector,” Iron Bridge said in its rejection letter. “It also does not reflect the fact that acquirers typically pay a higher premium to fairly compensate a company that is not actively seeking offers to sell.”

Besides evaluating the offers from lenders to develop the Gold Creek property, Iron Bridge is also starting to explore other alternatives, including bids from potential white knights.

It also took issue with Velvet’s legal counsel for the offer, Bennett Jones LLP. Iron Bridge said it had retained the same lawyer in talks with Velvet 12 months ago that did not end with a deal.

“At that time, the law firm had access to confidential and commercially sensitive information. The same partner who previously advised the board is now the lead legal adviser for the hostile offer,” Iron Bridge said, adding it would consider its legal options.

Ken Woolner, Velvet’s chief executive officer, took issue with the assertion, saying the company was assured by Bennett Jones that the lawyer acting for Velvet had no knowledge of Iron Bridge.

Mr. Woolner pointed out that Iron Bridge had only land at Gold Creek a year ago. “What strategic secrets could anybody allegedly leak to somebody? It’s basically a land play,” Mr. Woolner said. “It’s just trumped up to kind of create bad will, I guess.”

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Tickers mentioned in this story
Unchecking box will stop auto data updates
Comments

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • All comments will be reviewed by one or more moderators before being posted to the site. This should only take a few moments.
  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed. Commenters who repeatedly violate community guidelines may be suspended, causing them to temporarily lose their ability to engage with comments.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.
Cannabis pro newsletter